A New and Effective Approach to GML Documents Compression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geography Markup Language (GML) has become a de facto standard for encoding and exchanging geographic data. Usually, GML documents are of huge size due to its verbose structures and textual data, hence it is very costly to store and transit them. In this paper, we propose an effective pattern-based approach to compressing GML documents. First, a tree-structured pattern from the GML document under compression is extracted. Then, a tree automaton for matching the document against the extracted pattern is constructed. While doing compression, the GML document is matched against the pattern to generate a bits-stream that represents the difference between the document's structure and the extracted pattern. Meanwhile, we separate document structure from document content and group document content into different streams according to the tags. Spatial coordinate data are compressed by delta encoding. Finally, the extracted pattern, all streams and encodings are forwarded to a text compressor gzip. Extensive experiments on real GML documents show that the proposed approach outperforms the existing XML and GML compression approaches in compression ratio, while keeping an acceptable compression efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it