MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977736993 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n11p308

Management Aspects of Production Cost Accounting in Horse Breeding

2015· article· en· W1977736993 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Гузалия Клычова, Алсу Закирова, Zufar Zakirov, Gulnaz Valieva

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Financial Auditing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Management accountingCost accountingBusinessPoint (geometry)Marginal costSelection (genetic algorithm)Operations managementEconomicsIndustrial organizationMicroeconomicsComputer scienceAccountingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The particular management accounting lines are considered in the present paper, based on the state and currentpractice of production cost accounting study and calculation of production cost of horse breeding in the analyzedcompanies, to help the enterprise management in making reasonable decisions regarding maintenance of costmanagement in the given industry. The criteria of breakeven point, marginal income, and safety edge can beused for production planning, decision-making on pricing for prediction of enterprise development, in particular,the selection of efficient management strategy of benefits and costs. Having analyzed the possible strategies inmanagement of benefits, costs, one can determine the best options for management decisions (increase of priceand sales volume of koumiss).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicAgricultural and Financial AuditingFrench-language works237,207