MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977744091 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21756

Separation of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> on CaX zeolite for use in Landfill gas separation

2013· article· en· W1977744091 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sarah Oddy, Jessica Poupore, F. Handan Tezel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeoliteAdsorptionMethaneChemistryGas separationPressure swing adsorptionLimitingInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, adsorption separation of main components of landfill gas, methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) was carried out. Henry's law constants, limiting heat of adsorption values, pure and binary isotherms for CO 2 and CH 4 were determined for CaX zeolite adsorbent. Pure isotherm data were compared to those for NaX zeolite from previous studies. The CO 2 adsorption capacity of CaX was greater than that of NaX; however, NaX's separation factor was higher. The heat of adsorption for CO 2 for CaX was higher than those for NaX. © 2013 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207