Isoproterenol Increases CREB Phosphorylation and Olfactory Nerve–Evoked Potentials in Normal and 5-HT-Depleted Olfactory Bulbs in Rat Pups Only at Doses That Produce Odor Preference Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) are important modulators of early odor preference learning. NE can act as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), whereas 5-HT facilitates noradrenergic actions. In this study, we examined the phosphorylation of an important transcription factor, cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), which has been implicated in long-term-memory formation (McLean et al. 1999) during NE-induced odor preference learning in normal and olfactory bulb 5-HT-depleted rat pups. We also examined NE modulation of olfactory nerve-evoked field potentials (ON-EFPs) in anesthetized normal and bulbar 5-HT depleted pups. Systemic injection of 2 mg/kg isoproterenol (beta-adrenoceptor agonist) induced odor preference learning, enhanced pCREB expression in the olfactory bulbs at 10 min after odor pairing, and increased ON-EFPs in normal rat pups but not in bulbar 5-HT-depleted rat pups. A dose of 6 mg/kg isoproterenol, which was ineffective in modulating these measures in normal rat pups, induced odor preference learning, enhanced phosphorylated CREB (pCREB) expression, and increased ON-EFPs in bulbar 5-HT-depleted pups. These outcomes suggest that NE and 5-HT promote specific biochemical and electrophysiological changes that may critically underlie odor preference learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it