Densities and Viscosities of the Regular Quinary System: Toluene (1) + Octane (2) + Ethylbenzene (3) + Tetradecane (4) + Hexadecane (5) and Its Quaternary Subsystems at (308.15 and 313.15) K
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The densities and kinematic viscosities of the quaternary subsystems of the regular quinary system toluene (1) + octane (2) + ethylbenzene (3) + tetradecane (4) + hexadecane (5) were measured over the entire composition range at 308.15 K and 313.15 K. The viscosity deviations from the mole fraction-averaged viscosity of the mixture were calculated from the absolute viscosity data. All of the viscosity deviations are negative. The viscosity data reported herein were used to test the predictive capabilities of the predictive version of the McAllister model, which was reported by Nhaesi and Asfour and the Grunberg−Nissan equation. The obtained results showed that the McAllister model predicts the viscosity data better than the Grunberg−Nissan equation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".