MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diffuse Lung Cysts in Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia

2006· article· en· W1977843851 on OpenAlexaff
C. Isabela S. Silva, Julia Flint, Robert D. Levy, Néstor L. Müller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Imaging · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphoid hyperplasiaPathologyBronchiolitisLungPneumoniaInterstitial lung diseaseLymphomaExtrinsic Allergic AlveolitisRespiratory diseaseLymphatic systemRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lymphoid interstitial pneumonia is part of a spectrum of pulmonary lymphoproliferative disorders that range from benign, small, and airway-centered cellular infiltrates (follicular bronchiolitis, nodular lymphoid hyperplasia) to low-grade malignant lymphoma. Most of the cases occur in patients with underlying autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency. The characteristic high-resolution computed tomography findings consist of diffuse ground-glass opacities, ill-defined centrilobular nodules, bronchovascular thickening, interlobular septal thickening, and scattered thin-walled cysts. The cysts may be seen in up to 80% of the patients and are typically few in number and measure less than 3 cm in diameter. This case illustrates extensive cysts as the predominant high-resolution computed tomography finding of idiopathic lymphoid interstitial pneumonia in a 64-year-old man who underwent unilateral lung transplant. Such extensive cystic disease and lung transplantation treatment has not been previously described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic ImagingSame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207