Seasonal Abundance of Onion thrips, Thrips Tabaci Lindeman. in Sokoto, Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Onion seedlings were transplanted from November to March to study the population dynamics of onion thrips, Thripstabaci. There are four transplants in 2001/2002 and five in 2002/2003 seasons. In 2000/2001 season onion plants weregrown in exploratory trials and in 2003/2004, water traps were used to confirm results of the previous experiments.Results indicate that November transplant had a peak population of onion thrips in late February (176 thrips/plant);December (416 thrips/plant) and January (608 thrips/plant) transplants peaked in March, and February (148 thrips/plant)and March (86) transplants had peaks in April. Water traps indicate that the peak population of adult thrips was at thetime of harvest in April, similar to November transplant. The early transplant (November) had peak thrips population atmaturity and middle transplant recorded the peak population middle of the season and late transplant had their peaksearly part of the growing season. Therefore, the findings of this work revealed that onion thrips in Sokoto, Nigeria,breed from January to May with peak in March.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".