MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977868174 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2014.6947108

Polarization artefacts correction procedure for a spectro-polarimetric goniometer

2014· article· en· W1977868174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoniometerOpticsPolarimetrySpectrometerBidirectional reflectance distribution functionPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceLimitingRemote sensingPhysicsReflectivityEngineeringGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new goniometric device for spectro-polarimetric BRDF measurements is under development. This goniometer will measure linear and circular polarization of materials. Different instrument quality tests were realized in order to identify factors affecting the measured spectra and to obtain functional relationship between the instrument output and the real reflective properties of the materials. The most limiting of all factors influencing measured spectra was the polarization sensitivity of the spectrometer. Moreover, optical fiber bundle connected to the spectrometer input has unpredictable behavior in polarized light. In this paper, we present the artefacts produced by sensitivity of the spectrometer to the polarized light and describe the adequate measurement procedure to maintain instrument response under control and to acquire reliable BRDF measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207