MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977891801 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2005.857370

A monotonic digitally controlled delay element

2005· article· en· W1977891801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonotonic functionElement (criminal law)CMOSSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Control theory (sociology)Power (physics)VoltageElectronic engineeringMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A monotonic digitally controlled delay element (DCDE) is implemented in the 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS technology. In this paper, the design procedure of the new architecture and measurement results are reported. The delay of the DCDE changes monotonically with respect to the digital input vector. The monotonicity is one of the important features of this new architecture. Due to its monotonic behavior, the design of the DCDE is rather straightforward. The DCDE can be analyzed by a simple set of empirical equations with reasonable accuracy and can be made more tolerant to process, temperature, and supply voltage variations. The implemented delay element provides a delay resolution of as low as 2 ps and consumes 170 /spl mu/W to 340 /spl mu/W static power depending on the digital input vector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it