MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Human Nucleus Accumbens Is Highly Susceptible to G Protein Down‐Regulation by Methamphetamine and Heroin

2000· article· en· W1977892159 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Rae McLeman, Jerry J. Warsh, Lee Cyn Ang, Peter P. Li, Brian M. Ross, Junchao Tong, Gregory A. Schmunk, Vernard I. Adams, Stephen J. Kish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsNucleus accumbensMethamphetamineHeroinAddictionNeuroscienceBrain stimulation rewardPharmacologyDrugMedicineDopaminePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the nucleus accumbens is assumed to be a critical brain "pleasure center," its function in humans is unknown. As animal data suggest that a unique feature of this small brain area is its high sensitivity to down-regulation of an inhibitory G protein by drugs of abuse, we compared G protein levels in postmortem nucleus accumbens with those in seven other brain regions of chronic users of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, and of matched controls. Biochemical changes were restricted to the nucleus accumbens in which concentrations of G(alpha)1 and/or G(alpha)2 were reduced by 32-49% in the methamphetamine and heroin users. This selective responsiveness to these abused drugs implies a special role for the human nucleus accumbens in mechanisms of drug reinforcement and suggests that some features of the drug-dependent state (e.g., tolerance) might be related to inhibition of G(alpha)1-linked receptor activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207