Use of the Purified Poloxamer 407 for Temporary Coronary Occlusion in Off-Pump CABG Does Not Cause Myocardial Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : The new poloxamer 407 (LeGoo), a thermoreversible gel, previously showed efficiency in temporarily occluding coronary arteries and preserving endothelial function. However, its long-term effect on the myocardium after dissolution in bloodstream is uncertain. METHODS: : Two groups of pigs (12 total) were compared after being submitted to a 10-minute coronary occlusion either with silastic loops (snare group) or with poloxamer 407 injection (P407 group). Reflow was procured by snare removal or P407 dissolution with topical cooling. Animals were kept alive for 3 days with creatine kinase-MB and troponin T (TnT) plasmatic measurement at 3 hours and 3 days after surgery, when they were killed for myocardial histopathologic study. RESULTS: : Each animal survived during the study. Baseline plasmatic levels of cardiac enzymes were similar between both groups. No variation in creatine kinase-MB level throughout the study was seen in either group. A significant rise in TnT from baseline was noted 3 hours after reperfusion in both groups, with a peak level significantly lower in the P407 group (P < 0.05). TnT plasmatic levels returned to baseline level in both groups on the day the animals were killed (3 days). Histopathologic examinations of the stained myocardial samples showed no evidence of myocardial infarction either in the snare group or in the P407 group. CONCLUSIONS: : Poloxamer 407 does not cause myocardial damage after elimination in the bloodstream. The safety of this hemostatic device is now established, and application for FDA approval for human clinical studies is under way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".