MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1977916453 · doi:10.1139/w06-045

Identification and characterization of a polysaccharide deacetylase gene from <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i>

2006· article· en· W1977916453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kun Hu, Haihua Yang, Gang Liu, Huarong Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisSporeMutantGerminationSpore germinationBiologyMicrobiologyBacillalesWild typeBacillaceaeBacteriaGeneBiochemistryBotanyBacillus subtilisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One polysaccharide deacetylase gene was cloned from Bacillus thuringiensis and designated pdaA. Disruption of pdaA did not affect vegetative growth and sporulation but obviously affected spore germination. When L-alanine was added into the spore suspension, the spores of the pdaA disruption mutant showed a slow and partial reduction in absorbance at OD600 and became phase pale gray compared with phase dark of the wild-type strain. In contrast with the outgrowing of wild-type spores after germination, the pdaA mutant spores were blocked at the stage of spore germination. Transmission electron micrographs revealed a significant difference between the pdaA mutant and the wild-type strain in the spore cortex. Introduction of the pdaA gene into the pdaA disruption mutant complemented the germination-negative phenotype. Reverse transcription--polymerase chain reaction showed that pdaA was transcribed after incubation for 10 h in CCY medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research→French-language works237,207→