Le tourisme de réunions et de congrès : un champ de recherche pour une géographie de la mondialisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de la géographie de la mondialisation, il apparaît intéressant d'étudier le tourisme de congrès qui est par essence une activité basée sur les flux à la fois humains, économiques, scientifiques et culturels. Or, aborder ce sujet est relativement délicat à cause des nombreux problèmes liés à la terminologie et au manque de cohérence des statistiques le concernant. Cet article a pour objectif, tout d'abord, de préciser les définitions, d'expliciter les termes usités et de caractériser les sources d'information. Nous examinons ensuite la répartition des congrès internationaux afin, d'une part, de mettre à jour les dynamiques continentales et étatiques et d'analyser, d'autre part, le réseau des villes à l'échelle planétaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".