Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to understand the experiences of young adults living with a permanent ileostomy. The theoretical foundation for the study was narrative knowing. PARTICIPANTS: Seven young adults with a permanent ostomy for less than 4 years participated. Respondents included 3 men and 4 women between 24 and 40 years of age. METHOD: Using narrative inquiry as the method, data collection involved face-to-face interviews lasting from 1 hour to 2(1/2) hours. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. The transcriptions provided data to construct each participant's story. RESULTS: Common and divergent themes were identified across the stories and considered within the biophysical, psychological, and social components of participants' stories. Common themes were associated with disease processes, hospitalization, and social and personal adjustments for living with a permanent ileostomy. SUMMARY: The participants' stories provided a glimpse into their lives and the strength and courage they needed to adjust to living with an ileostomy. Healthcare providers seemed to underestimate these difficulties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".