MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977936538 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2007-022-5

Spherical Space Forms: Homotopy Types and Self-Equivalences for the Group (ℤ/<i>a</i> ⋊ ℤ/<i>b</i>) × <i>SL</i><sub>2</sub> (<i><sub>p</sub></i>)

2007· article· en· W1977936538 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marek Golasiński, Daciberg Lima Gonçalves

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de São PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMathematicsHomotopyHomotopy groupGroup (periodic table)CombinatoricsSpace (punctuation)Classifying spacePure mathematicsType (biology)Order (exchange)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let G = (ℤ/ a ⋊ ℤ/ b ) × SL 2 ( p ), and let X ( n ) be an n -dimensional CW -complex of the homotopy type of an n -sphere. We study the automorphism group Aut( G ) in order to compute the number of distinct homotopy types of spherical space forms with respect to free and cellular G -actions on all CW -complexes X (2 dn − 1), where 2 d is the period of G . The groups ε( X (2 dn − 1)/ μ ) of self homotopy equivalences of space forms X (2 dn − 1)/ μ associated with free and cellular G -actions μ on X (2 dn − 1) are determined as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207