MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977958357 · doi:10.1121/1.4887445

Scattering from a finite cylinder near an interface

2014· article· en· W1977958357 on OpenAlexaff
John A. Fawcett

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCylinderScatteringSuperposition principleAzimuthComputationPlane (geometry)Interface (matter)PhysicsBoundary value problemBoundary (topology)Symmetry (geometry)Mathematical analysisMatrix (chemical analysis)Surface (topology)OpticsGeometryMathematicsMechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a Boundary Integral Equation Method (BIEM) is described for the computation of scattering from a finite, rigid, cylinder near a pressure release interface. The cylinder lies parallel or tilted with respect to the interface plane so that the azimuthal symmetry of the problem is destroyed. The scattering solution is first described in terms of an azimuthally symmetric free space solution. The multiple interactions of the scattered field with the interface are accounted for by an azimuthal-conversion matrix. In Sec. III, the method of this paper is benchmarked using wavefield superposition for a sphere near a pressure-release surface. Computed scattered spectra are shown for a finite cylinder, parallel and tilted with respect to the interface, and for a variety of source/receiver geometries. The differences resulting from not including multiple target/interface interactions (single scatter solution) and from including all interactions are presented. The problem of irregular frequencies for the single-scatter and the fully coupled BIEM are discussed and numerically examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207