MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of multiple sequence variants of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus using primers targeting the polymerase domain and partial genome sequencing of a novel variant

2011· article· en· W1977963634 on OpenAlexafffund
Federica Terlizzi, Chengdao Li, Claudio Ratti, Wenping Qiu, R. Credi, Baozhong Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Applied Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsGenomeSequence (biology)In silico PCRReference genomeGenePolymerase chain reactionComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) is a member of the genus Foveavirus within the new family Betaflexiviridae. GRSPaV is distributed among grapevines worldwide and is implicated in the disease rupestris stem pitting (RSP) of the rugose wood complex and two other disorders. GRSPaV is composed of a wide range of sequence variants, and so far, the complete genomes of five sequence variants have been sequenced. Quick and reliable detection of different GRSPaV variants is a critical step in the elimination and control of GRSPaV. Previously, primers designed from various genomic regions have been used in RT-PCR for the detection of GRSPaV variants. The efficiency of RT-PCR varied widely depending on the spectrum of the primers that were used. In this study, we designed a pair of degenerate primers based on the consensus sequence of the genomic region encoding the highly conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domain from five reference isolates of GRSPaV for which the genome sequence are available. We demonstrate that this set of primers is comparable, if not superior, to the broad-spectrum primers RSP13&14 in detecting multiple GRSPaV variants. Using these degenerate primers, we identified two new and distinct sequence variants. The 3′ terminal genomic region of one of the new variants, GRSPaV-ML, spanning the 3′ part of ORF1, through the entire open reading frames 2–4, and the 5′ region of ORF5 were sequenced. Sequence comparison demonstrates that GRSPaV-ML is distinct from each of the five reference isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Applied BiologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207