MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977976451 · doi:10.1145/1968613.1968763

BER analysis for hard MMSE detection in MIMO systems

2011· article· en· W1977976451 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Liu, Il‐Min Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationBit error rateMIMOQAMStatisticMonte Carlo methodPulse-amplitude modulationComputer scienceAlgorithmModulation (music)Phase-shift keyingQuadrature (astronomy)AmplitudeAmplitude modulationSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsFrequency modulationTelecommunicationsPulse (music)Electronic engineeringStatisticsBandwidth (computing)PhysicsEngineeringDecoding methodsDetectorChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first conduct error analysis for a general system with decision statistic, z = ax + u, where a > 0, x is the transmitted signal, and u is the additive noise which is arbitrarily distributed and independent of x. For this system, we derive the exact and closed-form bit-error rate (BER) expressions for M-ary pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), which include the well-known BER result in [?] as a special case. Based on the general analysis, we further derive the exact and closed-form instantaneous BER expression for hard MMSE detection in multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) systems. Finally, the analysis is verified through our own Monte Carlo simulations and the simulation results reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207