MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977988626 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v2n1p192

Enterprise Social Responsibility and Enterprise Sustainable Development

2009· article· en· W1977988626 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huiyuan Mao, Yunfeng Ai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBusiness and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessEnterprise life cycleSocial responsibilitySustainable developmentEnterprise planning systemEnterprise softwareEnterprise information systemEnterprise systems engineeringAction (physics)Social enterpriseEnterprise architecture managementSocial economyMeaning (existential)Enterprise integrationSustainable businessCompetition (biology)Enterprise architectureProcess managementSustainabilityPublic relationsEconomicsMarket economyPolitical scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterprise undertaking social responsibility is not a business posture, but is the result of market economy development in some stage, is the inner demand of enterprise and self-conscious action. Enterprise social responsibility has become a new competition after the talent, technology and management, is the important variable effected enterprise sustainable development, this paper introduces the meaning of enterprise social responsibility and enterprise sustainable development, dissertates the relationship between enterprise undertaking social responsibility and enterprise sustainable development, analyzes enterprise how to come true sustainable and build up harmonious society through undertaking social responsibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicBusiness and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207