Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Pierre Roubaud fut un des plus grands faussaires de notre histoire. Spécialisé dans la contrefaçon littéraire, il a produit une quantité considérable de documents sur lesquels les historiens de la Nouvelle-France et du Canada butent inexorablement. Son oeuvre la plus célèbre, Les Lettres du marquis de Montcalm écrites dans les années 1757, 1758, 1759, attira particulièrement l'attention des chercheurs. Publiée, elle deviendra un document historio-graphique minant le territoire de l'historien. Des éléments nouveaux révèlent des aspects cependant peu connus de ces lettres et règlent définitivement, selon moi, la polémique au sujet de leur attribution; en effet, une source fut occultée: une lettre autobiographique de Pierre Roubaud, écrite en 1776, et qui constitue une pièce majeure au procès que lui ont intenté les historiens. C'est cette source inédite queje veux ici mettre en évidence, tout en traçant un portrait d'ensemble du personnage et de ses écrits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".