MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978017600 · doi:10.1117/12.566894

1.5- to 0.8-μm optical upconversion by wafer fusion

2004· article· en· W1978017600 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Luo, Dayan Ban, Huichun C. Liu, A. J. SpringThorpe, Z. R. Wasilewski, M. Buchanan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoton upconversionWaferMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsFusionDoping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An InGaAs photodetector array interconnected with a silicon readout IC is the industry standard for 1.2-1.6 μm imaging applications. However, the indium-bump technique it employs for interconnection makes it expensive. An alternative approach is to combine a CCD with a device that upconverts 1.2-1.6 μm radiation to a wavelength below 1 μm. Here we report the realization of a 1.5 μm to 0.87 μm optical upconversion device using wafer fusion technology. The device consists of an InGaAs/InP PIN photodetector and an AlGaAs/GaAs light emitting diode (LED). Incoming 1.5 μm light is absorbed by the InGaAs photodetector. The resulting photocurrent drives the GaAs LED, which emits at 0.87 μm. The PIN and LED structures are epitaxially grown on an InP and a GaAs substrate, respectively. The two wafers are wafer fused together, the GaAs substrate is removed, and the sample is processed using conventional microfabrication technology. In this paper, we first present the design and fabrication process of the device. We then discuss the approaches to increase device efficiency. We show, both experimentally and theoretically, that the active layer doping affects the LED internal quantum efficiency, especially under low current injection. An optimum doping value is obtained. The LED extraction efficiency is increased using several approaches, including micro-lens and surface scattering. Overall device efficiency is further improved by introducing a gain mechanism into the photodetector. Our results show the potentials of this integrated photodetector-LED device for 1.2-1.6 μm imaging applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207