A Numerical Study of the 1996 Saguenay Flood Cyclone: Effect of Assimilation of Precipitation Data on Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A one-dimensional variational (1DVAR) technique is applied to assimilate rain gauge precipitation data to extend the predictability of the Saguenay flood cyclone associated with a trough-merger event on 19–21 July 1996 in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region of Quebec, Canada. Two 60-h simulations initialized at 0000 UTC 19 July were performed with the Canadian Mesoscale Compressible Community (MC2) model. The control (CTL) and NCEP simulations were initialized with the enhanced temperature and moisture profiles obtained from the 1DVAR scheme and the NCEP reanalysis data, respectively. Compared to observations, the CTL simulation reasonably reproduced the observed mass and wind fields and showed a marked improvement in the threat scores for heavy precipitation. The CTL run captured the observed spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation but overpredicted the area of precipitation. Sensitivity experiments showed that the threat (bias) scores are less (somewhat) sensitive to the specification of the observation error of the precipitation data. Of the four precipitation systems present at model initial time, the systems in the vicinity of the southern trough had the biggest impact on the threat score. Potential vorticity diagnostics of the CTL simulation suggested that the initial temperature and moisture field near the southern trough decreased the condensational heating relative to NCEP. This resulted in a stronger zonal wind component in the upper levels associated with the southern trough in CTL that retarded the eastward propagation of the northern trough, resulting in a correct placement of the surface precipitation and an improvement in the threat scores relative to NCEP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".