MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978034717 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2006.0031

Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin (review)

2005· article· en· W1978034717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialogicArt historyArtVisual artsIntellectModernityCharacter (mathematics)HistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin Petra Kuppers Nicolas Whybrow . Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin. Bristol: Intellect, 2005. Pp. 182, illustrated. $39.95/£19.95 (Pb). Memorial, site of accidents, museum, and destination point of a flight – Whybrow stages Berlin as an encounter zone, as a space through which he rambles [End Page 854] and in which he picks up connections. Whybrow collages and montages. He takes seriously the conditions of city living and modernity set out by the two figures who enigmatically weave through this text: Bertolt Brecht and Walter Benjamin. As a reader, I am invited to join Whybrow as he moves through Berlin and experience with him the epiphany of theoretical connections as well as the differently heady delights of street encounters and small scenes. The text is accompanied by Whybrow's photos of Berlin, shots of street signs, panoramas, monuments, architecture, and other images that clearly connote the snapshot, the tourist's gaze. The images are made en passant, minor because of their small size and of the way that they are inserted into the running texts. I find them personal and intriguing, since they are so clearly dialogic, rather than illustrative, in character. Potential dialogue, heteroglossia, and (missed) connections create for me the atmosphere of reading Whybrow's book. It is hard to say who this book is aimed at. This is not an introductory academic text, as it is hard to pick up a coherent authorial vision of either Brecht or Benjamin (or the history of their criticism) from these pages. Neither Brecht's and Benjamin's own voices ring out loud and clear over this text or even appear in a conversation with Whybrow's writing: we hear a lot more of what critics other than Whybrow think of them and made of them in their own arguments than of the two authors themselves. But while the refusal to make monoliths out of either of these two, or out of the author's perspective, is a very respectable move, fully in keeping with the collagist attitude of Brecht, a more developed introduction would have made me more inclined to put the text on a reading list. And while there is a sound inner logic to refusing to "introduce" Brecht and Benjamin, some other omissions seem to point to blind spots rather than rhetorical maneuvers. Even so many years after Benjamin's flânerie, Whybrow does not, at times, seem too aware of his own sociocultural position within the Berlin city scene: foreigner, tourist, academic, person mobile enough to cross borders. Benjamin criticism has often homed in on those spots where Ben-jamin's vision renders invisible his own position – and I desire to see more reflection on the sociopolitical aspects of crossing space. Unsurprisingly, when reading the book, my own persona intrudes – for instance, when Whybrow talks about some of the "funny things" about Berlin, he points to the weird ol' habit of numbering houses in unusual ways (i.e., different from what he is used to). Is my patronization alarm ringing only because I am German and huffy at this Brit's Grand Tour or because I do actually know some of the reasons for the supposedly "strange" numbering, reasons that he cannot be bothered to go and look up, leaving the numbering as native quaintness in the wake of his travelogue? He clearly gets my back up with his decisions, and that's interesting. The book is to me most successful when Whybrow goes ambling and [End Page 855] allows me insights into his magpie mind, binding together his own experience of witnessing an accident while on the way to a wedding party with Brecht's poem "On Everyday Theatre" and the core position and responsibility of a street accident witness within this. At other times, his wandering brings him to a bluish light, like a will-o'-the-wisp, and I am invited to come upon the site of Goebbels' book burning, now a lit window into a subterranean library room with empty shelves, sending out its light into Berlin, attracting people like moths. But in order to get to these wonderful moments in Whybrow's writing...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it