MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1978034717 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2006.0031

Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin (review)

2005· article· en· W1978034717 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDialogicArt historyArtVisual artsIntellectModernityCharacter (mathematics)HistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin Petra Kuppers Nicolas Whybrow . Street Scenes: Brecht, Benjamin and Berlin. Bristol: Intellect, 2005. Pp. 182, illustrated. $39.95/£19.95 (Pb). Memorial, site of accidents, museum, and destination point of a flight – Whybrow stages Berlin as an encounter zone, as a space through which he rambles [End Page 854] and in which he picks up connections. Whybrow collages and montages. He takes seriously the conditions of city living and modernity set out by the two figures who enigmatically weave through this text: Bertolt Brecht and Walter Benjamin. As a reader, I am invited to join Whybrow as he moves through Berlin and experience with him the epiphany of theoretical connections as well as the differently heady delights of street encounters and small scenes. The text is accompanied by Whybrow's photos of Berlin, shots of street signs, panoramas, monuments, architecture, and other images that clearly connote the snapshot, the tourist's gaze. The images are made en passant, minor because of their small size and of the way that they are inserted into the running texts. I find them personal and intriguing, since they are so clearly dialogic, rather than illustrative, in character. Potential dialogue, heteroglossia, and (missed) connections create for me the atmosphere of reading Whybrow's book. It is hard to say who this book is aimed at. This is not an introductory academic text, as it is hard to pick up a coherent authorial vision of either Brecht or Benjamin (or the history of their criticism) from these pages. Neither Brecht's and Benjamin's own voices ring out loud and clear over this text or even appear in a conversation with Whybrow's writing: we hear a lot more of what critics other than Whybrow think of them and made of them in their own arguments than of the two authors themselves. But while the refusal to make monoliths out of either of these two, or out of the author's perspective, is a very respectable move, fully in keeping with the collagist attitude of Brecht, a more developed introduction would have made me more inclined to put the text on a reading list. And while there is a sound inner logic to refusing to "introduce" Brecht and Benjamin, some other omissions seem to point to blind spots rather than rhetorical maneuvers. Even so many years after Benjamin's flânerie, Whybrow does not, at times, seem too aware of his own sociocultural position within the Berlin city scene: foreigner, tourist, academic, person mobile enough to cross borders. Benjamin criticism has often homed in on those spots where Ben-jamin's vision renders invisible his own position – and I desire to see more reflection on the sociopolitical aspects of crossing space. Unsurprisingly, when reading the book, my own persona intrudes – for instance, when Whybrow talks about some of the "funny things" about Berlin, he points to the weird ol' habit of numbering houses in unusual ways (i.e., different from what he is used to). Is my patronization alarm ringing only because I am German and huffy at this Brit's Grand Tour or because I do actually know some of the reasons for the supposedly "strange" numbering, reasons that he cannot be bothered to go and look up, leaving the numbering as native quaintness in the wake of his travelogue? He clearly gets my back up with his decisions, and that's interesting. The book is to me most successful when Whybrow goes ambling and [End Page 855] allows me insights into his magpie mind, binding together his own experience of witnessing an accident while on the way to a wedding party with Brecht's poem "On Everyday Theatre" and the core position and responsibility of a street accident witness within this. At other times, his wandering brings him to a bluish light, like a will-o'-the-wisp, and I am invited to come upon the site of Goebbels' book burning, now a lit window into a subterranean library room with empty shelves, sending out its light into Berlin, attracting people like moths. But in order to get to these wonderful moments in Whybrow's writing...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,909
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,602

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle