MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978069958 · doi:10.3166/sth.2.175-186

Exploration multimodale d'images pour des utilisateurs ayant une déficience visuelle

2008· article· fr· W1978069958 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grégory Petit, Aude Dufresne, Vincent Lévesque, Vincent Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueSciences et Technologies pour le Handicap · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gregory Petit1,2, Aude Dufresne2, Vincent Levesque3, Vincent Hayward3 1 Maison des technologies de formation et d'apprentissage Roland-Giguere Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal Pavillon JA Bombardier C.P. 6079, succ. Centre-ville Montreal (Quebec) H3C 3A7, Canada 2Laboratoire de Recherche en Communication Multimedia Universite de Montreal C.P.6128 Succ Centre-Ville Montreal (Quebec) H3C 3J7, Canada 3Haptics Laboratory Center for Intelligent Machines McGill University McConnell Engineering Building, Room 438 3480 University Montreal (Quebec) H3A 2A7, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSciences et Technologies pour le HandicapSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207