MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978081277 · doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0070

Using Telehealth for Assessment of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: The Experience of Two Canadian Rural and Remote Communities

2010· article· en· W1978081277 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carla Ens, Ana Hanlon‐Dearman, Mary Cox Millar, Sally Longstaffe

Bibliographic record

VenueTelemedicine Journal and e-Health · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelehealthFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderTelemedicineMedicinePregnancyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A well-established program in Manitoba to evaluate fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) by telemedicine was carefully reviewed for qualitative effectiveness in a 2009 survey in two rural and remote northern Manitoban communities by comparing community practices from the perspective of professionals working with the FASD diagnostic clinics in these communities. Participants regarded the FASD telehealth program as successful and useful, especially given the remote location of the communities and the lack of on-site services. Recommendations addressing the barriers pertaining to the process were made from the study's findings and available scientific literature. Intoduction:Telehealth has been used for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) diagnostic assessment in select Manitoban communities since 2000.Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the FASD telehealth program within two rural and remote Northern Manitoban communities by comparing community practices from the perspective of professionals working with the FASD diagnostic clinics in these communities. Recommendations for the further development of FASD assessment by telehealth were made to further improve current implementation and guide expansion of the FASD telehealth program within the province.Methodology:Semistructured interviews were conducted from October 19 to December 11, 2009. Participants (N = 26) were comprised of professionals, including those in the education, social services, and health sectors.Results and Recommendations:Two themes emerged from the data and covered the perceived strengths and drawbacks with the program, and meaningful suggestions to improve the service. Participants regarded the FASD telehealth program as successful and useful, especially given the remote location of the communities and the lack of on-site services. Recommendations addressing the barriers pertaining to the process were made from the study's findings and available scientific literature.Conclusions:This study will provide a solid basis for the successful further development of the FASD telehealth programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelemedicine Journal and e-HealthSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207