MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978082650 · doi:10.1093/isle/13.2.281

This Elusive Land: Women and the Canadian Environment

2006· article· en· W1978082650 on OpenAlex
Cheryl Lousley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWainwrightGeographyHistoryLibrary scienceSociologyMedia studiesArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Elusive Land: Women and the Canadian Environment Get access This Elusive Land: Women and the Canadian Environment. Edited by Melody Hessing, Rebecca Raglon, and Catriona Sandilands. Vancouver: UBC P, 2005. 384 pp. Cloth $85.00. Paper $24.95 (CAN). Every Grain of Sand: Canadian Perspectives on Ecology and Environment. Edited by J. A. Wainwright. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier UP, 2004. 181 pp. Paper $24.95 (CAN). Cheryl Lousley Cheryl Lousley York UniversityToronto Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, Volume 13, Issue 2, Summer 2006, Pages 281–283, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/13.2.281 Published: 01 July 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it