MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978084257 · doi:10.1021/es001064c

Photooxidation Pathway of Sulforhodamine-B. Dependence on the Adsorption Mode on TiO<sub>2</sub> Exposed to Visible Light Radiation

2000· article· en· W1978084257 on OpenAlexaff
Guangming Liu, Xiangzhong Li, Jincai Zhao, Hisao Hidaka, Nick Serpone

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotochemistryDiethylamineChemistrySulforhodamine BAdsorptionSodium dodecylbenzenesulfonatePhotocatalysisVisible spectrumAcetaldehydeChromophoreAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal course of the photooxidation of sulforhodamine-B (SRB) in aqueous media illuminated by visible wavelengths in the presence of TiO 2 has been examined to determine the nature of the intermediate species produced and to explore the operative reaction pathway(s). Two pathways are described to account for the differences in the final photooxidation products whose nature depends on the different modes of adsorption of the dye on the metal-oxide mediator. In the SRB/TiO 2 system, when SRB is adsorbed on the positively charged TiO 2 particle surface through a sulfonate group cleavage of the SRB chromophore structure predominates and N -de-ethylation occurs only to a slight extent with the major photooxidation products being diethylamine and carbon dioxide. In the presence of the anionic dodecylbenzenesulfonate surfactant DBS, when SRB is near the negatively charged DBS/TiO 2 interface through the positive diethylamine group N -de-ethylation occurs preferentially before destruction of the structure with the major products being acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations257
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207