Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neurenteric cysts are rare congenital epithelium-lined cysts of the central nervous system. They are found predominantly in the spinal cord, with lower incidence in the intracranial compartment, and may be associated with various other congenital spinal anomalies. Seven patients with symptomatic intraspinal neurenteric cysts are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with intraspinal neurenteric cysts aged from nine months to ten years treated at this hospital from May 2000 to July 2006 were reviewed. The clinical manifestations, imaging and surgical findings of patients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent operation. One patient's cervical neurenteric cyst was resected using the lateral cervical approach, and the other six resections were performed with posterior approach. RESULTS: All seven patients presented with neurological involvement. One patient had an intramedullary cyst, while the other six cysts were situated ventrally. Three patients' cysts occurred in the cervical region, two in the cervicothoracic region, one in the thoracic region and one in the lumbar region. One patient had bony anomalies, and one had a lumbar posterior occult spinal dysraphism. Five patients' symptoms improved rapidly after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraspinal neurenteric cysts in children are rare and most occur ventral to the spinal cord. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective imaging modality. Earlier diagnosis and surgical resection of spinal neurenteric cysts improves prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it