Optimization of Production Performance in a CO2 Flooding Reservoir Under Uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CO2 flooding has gained momentum in the oil and gas industry and might be suitable for approximately 80% of oil reservoirs worldwide based on the oil recovery criteria alone. In addition to miscibility, production performance needs to be optimized to achieve higher sweep efficiency and oil recovery. Although many techniques have been made available for production optimization in the upstream oil and gas industry, it is still a challenging task to optimize production performance in the presence of physical and/or financial uncertainties. In this paper, a new technique is developed to optimize production performance in a CO2 flooding reservoir under uncertainty. More specifically, potential uncertainties influencing production performance are analyzed and assessed by using the geostatistical technique. This enables us to integrate the available information within a unified and consistent framework and to generate multiple geological realizations accounting for uncertainty and spatial variability. Subsequently, the net present value (NPV) is selected as the objective function to be optimized by using the genetic algorithm, while well rates of the injectors and the flowing bottomhole pressure for the producers are chosen as the controlling variables. In addition, corresponding modifications have been made to accelerate the convergence speed of the genetic algorithm. A field case is used to demonstrate the procedures of the newly developed technique and the optimized results show that the oil recovery and the NPV can be increased by 6.4% and 9.2%, respectively. It is also found that the genetic algorithm is a powerful and reliable search method to optimize production performance of reservoirs with complex structures. Introduction CO2 flooding is considered as a promising and practical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process because it not only increases oil recovery, but also reduces greenhouse gas emissions by sequestrating CO2 in the depleted reservoirs. In practice, CO2 flooding performance can be greatly affected by the reservoir heterogeneity, which can severely reduce the sweep efficiency, result in early CO2 breakthrough at the producers, and thus, leave a large amount of bypassed oil in the reservoir(1). Therefore, it is of fundamental and practical importance to optimize production performance of a CO2 flooding reservoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".