MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978102978 · doi:10.2118/133374-pa

Optimization of Production Performance in a CO2 Flooding Reservoir Under Uncertainty

2010· article· en· W1978102978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
KeywordsEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringProduction (economics)InjectorFlooding (psychology)Net present valueGenetic algorithmComputer scienceOil productionEnvironmental scienceUpstream (networking)Fossil fuelOil fieldMathematical optimizationProcess engineeringEngineeringMathematicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract CO2 flooding has gained momentum in the oil and gas industry and might be suitable for approximately 80% of oil reservoirs worldwide based on the oil recovery criteria alone. In addition to miscibility, production performance needs to be optimized to achieve higher sweep efficiency and oil recovery. Although many techniques have been made available for production optimization in the upstream oil and gas industry, it is still a challenging task to optimize production performance in the presence of physical and/or financial uncertainties. In this paper, a new technique is developed to optimize production performance in a CO2 flooding reservoir under uncertainty. More specifically, potential uncertainties influencing production performance are analyzed and assessed by using the geostatistical technique. This enables us to integrate the available information within a unified and consistent framework and to generate multiple geological realizations accounting for uncertainty and spatial variability. Subsequently, the net present value (NPV) is selected as the objective function to be optimized by using the genetic algorithm, while well rates of the injectors and the flowing bottomhole pressure for the producers are chosen as the controlling variables. In addition, corresponding modifications have been made to accelerate the convergence speed of the genetic algorithm. A field case is used to demonstrate the procedures of the newly developed technique and the optimized results show that the oil recovery and the NPV can be increased by 6.4% and 9.2%, respectively. It is also found that the genetic algorithm is a powerful and reliable search method to optimize production performance of reservoirs with complex structures. Introduction CO2 flooding is considered as a promising and practical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process because it not only increases oil recovery, but also reduces greenhouse gas emissions by sequestrating CO2 in the depleted reservoirs. In practice, CO2 flooding performance can be greatly affected by the reservoir heterogeneity, which can severely reduce the sweep efficiency, result in early CO2 breakthrough at the producers, and thus, leave a large amount of bypassed oil in the reservoir(1). Therefore, it is of fundamental and practical importance to optimize production performance of a CO2 flooding reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it