MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978107077 · doi:10.1080/08940886.2011.583891

Topics in Coherent Synchrotron Radiation: Experimental Consequences of Radiation Impedance

2011· article· en· W1978107077 on OpenAlexaff
Brant Billinghurst, John C. Bergstrom

Bibliographic record

VenueSynchrotron Radiation News · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchrotron radiationRadiationOpticsSynchrotronHigh-energy X-raysPhysicsFlux (metallurgy)Electrical impedanceComputational physicsMaterials scienceBeamline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) is now an established source of radiation in the terahertz region, with flux capabilities many orders of magnitude higher than conventional SR sources. Accordingly, CSR is playing an ever-increasing role in the field of Far-IR spectroscopy at synchrotron facilities around the world. However, with the improvement in spectroscopic resolution, the incident CSR spectra from several facilities are displaying intensity profiles that appear to be modulated by periodic peaks or deep indentations, while theory predicts a featureless distribution. After eliminating the usual suspects, like multiple reflections from windows, etc., one looks for a deeper explanation, such as the role played by the radiation impedance. This impedance is largely defined by the vacuum chamber in the region of the bend magnets, but probably with some effects from the straight sections as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynchrotron Radiation NewsSame topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207