MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Efficacy of Interconnected Porous Hydroxyapatite in Achieving Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Sheep

2000· article· en· W1978107484 on OpenAlexaff
Hani G. Baramki, Thomas Steffen, P. Lander, Margaret H. Chang, Dante Marchesi

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbarIliac crestArthrodesisCancellous boneSpinal fusionRadiographyBiomedical engineeringSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: An animal study was performed to evaluate lumbar spinal fusion radiologically and mechanically. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in sheep. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterolateral spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone graft is the gold standard procedure for lumbar fusion. The procedure for harvesting bone from the iliac crest increases morbidity. Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite has been used effectively as an alternative to cancellous bone graft material in metaphyseal bone defects. Little is known about the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Four groups of seven sheep underwent bisegmental posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation using different intertransverse graft material. In group 1, no graft material was used. In group 2, autologous bone was used. Group 3 had interconnected porous hydroxyapatite. Group 4 had an equip of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite and autologous bone. The animals were killed at 20 weeks after surgery. Radiographs and computed tomography images were obtained. The fusion masses were graded for bone resorption and trabecular connectivity on the computed tomography images. Mechanical testing of the specimens was performed, and the three-dimensional segmental motion was measured in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. RESULTS: The radiographic images were difficult to interpret because of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules. According to mechanical stability criteria, the fusion rate for the different groups was as follows: 100% (14/14) for the autologous bone group, 72% (10/14) for the bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, 50% (7/14) for the pure interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, and 15% (2/14) for the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal arthrodesis using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite alone or mixed with bone as graft material reduced segmental motion. It was not, however, as effective as autologous bone graft material in achieving spinal arthrodesis. The sheep model using autologous bone achieved a 100% fusion rate. Because the nonunion rate for a single level in humans may be as high as 40%, the fusion rate with bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in humans may be lower than the 72% found in the sheep model. The little resorption of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules made the radiologic evaluation of the fusion masses difficult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207