The Efficacy of Interconnected Porous Hydroxyapatite in Achieving Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Sheep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: An animal study was performed to evaluate lumbar spinal fusion radiologically and mechanically. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in sheep. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterolateral spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone graft is the gold standard procedure for lumbar fusion. The procedure for harvesting bone from the iliac crest increases morbidity. Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite has been used effectively as an alternative to cancellous bone graft material in metaphyseal bone defects. Little is known about the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Four groups of seven sheep underwent bisegmental posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation using different intertransverse graft material. In group 1, no graft material was used. In group 2, autologous bone was used. Group 3 had interconnected porous hydroxyapatite. Group 4 had an equip of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite and autologous bone. The animals were killed at 20 weeks after surgery. Radiographs and computed tomography images were obtained. The fusion masses were graded for bone resorption and trabecular connectivity on the computed tomography images. Mechanical testing of the specimens was performed, and the three-dimensional segmental motion was measured in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. RESULTS: The radiographic images were difficult to interpret because of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules. According to mechanical stability criteria, the fusion rate for the different groups was as follows: 100% (14/14) for the autologous bone group, 72% (10/14) for the bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, 50% (7/14) for the pure interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, and 15% (2/14) for the sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal arthrodesis using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite alone or mixed with bone as graft material reduced segmental motion. It was not, however, as effective as autologous bone graft material in achieving spinal arthrodesis. The sheep model using autologous bone achieved a 100% fusion rate. Because the nonunion rate for a single level in humans may be as high as 40%, the fusion rate with bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in humans may be lower than the 72% found in the sheep model. The little resorption of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules made the radiologic evaluation of the fusion masses difficult.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".