Collective reaction behavior of an oscillating system coupled with an excitable reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collective reaction behavior of limit cycles coupled to a nonoscillatory forcing is investigated experimentally and computationally. The coupled chemical system is constructed by adding 1,4-cyclohexanedione (CHD), a species which is capable of forming an oscillator with acidic bromate, into the cerium-catalyzed Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction. Two levels of coupling exist in the system: (1) through autocatalytic reactions with bromine dioxide radicals and (2) via reactions with oxidized metal catalysts. Experiments illustrate that there is an optimum [1,4-CHD]/[cerium] ratio for inducing complex oscillations, whereas in the 1,4-CHD and malonic acid concentration phase plane two resonant ratios are observed for the onset of complex behavior. In addition, bromate, the oxidant for both suboscillators, also exhibits subtle influences on the complexity of the collective reaction behavior. The experimental observations are qualitatively reproduced with the Field-Koros-Noyes mechanism, modified to account for the coupling reactions with the 1,4-CHD-bromate system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".