MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978201784 · doi:10.7202/1018046ar

L’intégration des jeunes peu qualifiés dans une entreprise d’économie sociale : travailler autrement ?

2013· article· fr· W1978201784 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Amélie Champagne, Romaine Malenfant, Guy Bellemare, Louise Briand

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs publications, ces dernières décennies, s’intéressent aux difficultés importantes qui accompagnent l’insertion professionnelle des jeunes. En effet, il appert que les difficultés d’insertion dans le secteur privé soient importantes, notamment pour les jeunes sans diplôme et possédant peu ou pas d’expérience du marché du travail. Mais qu’en est-il en ce qui concerne le secteur de l’économie socialeƒ? Les valeurs et les objectifs de développement de ces entreprises favoriseraient-ils une expérience d’intégration au marché du travail positive pour les jeunes peu scolarisés? Le présent article se centre sur les pratiques de gestion de la main-d’oeuvre jeune du point de vue de ces derniers et de celui de leurs employeurs. Deux recherches sont mises en dialogue afin de préciser et de comparer les dimensions qui exercent un rôle significatif dans la consolidation ou la rupture du lien d’emploi des jeunes. Le paradigme du don est également mobilisé dans l’analyse des rapports sociaux qui semblent caractériser les entreprises d’économie sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207