MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978212957 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v10-n2-217-228

Two applications of wavelet analysis for project level pavement management

2015· article· en· W1978212957 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rayya Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletAsset managementElevation (ballistics)Computer sciencePavement managementWavelet transformRoad surfaceSurface finishEngineeringTransport engineeringStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceCivil engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wavelet analysis is a signal processing technique that can be used to decompose longitudinal road surface profile signal into a number of wavebands. The outputs of the analysis include the signals (elevation vs. distance) and energies (a measure of elevation variation, i.e. surface roughness) in the different wavebands. The application of wavelet analysis in road pavement management at project level is described herein through two case studies. The first involves using wavelet analysis outputs in identifying and locating excitation sources of dynamic wheel loads (DWL) along a road section. The second case study involves using these outputs in assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment in reducing surface roughness in the different wavebands along the length of a road section. The outcomes of this research study indicate that the proposed applications are effective in addressing the intended purposes. Study findings also indicate that using HATI to highlight sections subject to high DWL at network level is promising. However, further testing is required to confirm its suitability at different speeds and operating environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207