MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978230167 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v5n8p25

Corporate Profit Growth, Macroeconomic Expectations and Fiscal Policy Volatility

2013· article· en· W1978230167 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rexford Abaidoo, Daisy Ofosuhene Kwenin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsVolatility (finance)Distributed lagMonetary economicsShort runProfit (economics)MacroeconomicsFiscal policyEconometricsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines how specific macroeconomic conditions influence US Corporate Profit Growth in a dynamic trend framework. Using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) co-integration approach, this study evaluates short and long-run dynamics of corporate profit growth in an environment characterized by specific macroeconomic conditions. Our results show that trends in corporate profit growth are not entirely immune to macroeconomic perturbations or constrained economic conditions as recent corporate profit growth conditions seem to suggest. We find that although modeled macroeconomic conditions (Note 1) have no statically significant impact on corporate profit growth in the short run; in the long run, conditions such as macroeconomic uncertainty, inflation expectation and fiscal policy volatility depresses or have significant constraining effect on corporate profit growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207