MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978234836 · doi:10.1103/physreve.61.6705

Phase-field modeling of eutectic growth

2000· article· en· W1978234836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutectic systemSpinodal decompositionMaterials scienceLamellar structureThermodynamicsPhase (matter)Isothermal processPhase diagramVolume fractionDiffusionDirectional solidificationField (mathematics)Non-equilibrium thermodynamicsMicrostructurePhysicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A phase-field model of eutectic growth is proposed in terms of a free energy F, which is a functional of a liquid-solid order parameter psi, and a conserved concentration field c. The model is shown to recover the important features of a eutectic phase diagram and to reduce to the standard sharp-interface formulation of nonequilibrium growth. It is successfully applied to the study of directional solidification when the solid phase is a single or two phase state. The crystallization of a eutectic compound under isothermal conditions is also considered. For that process, the transformed volume fraction and psi-field structure factor, both measured during numerical simulations, closely match theoretical predictions. Three possible growth mechanisms are also identified: diffusion-limited growth, lamellar growth, and spinodal decomposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it