MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978242984 · doi:10.1118/1.2961656

SU‐GG‐J‐106: Improved Planar and Megavoltage Cone‐Beam Imaging Using Low‐Z Linear Accelerator Targets

2008· article· en· W1978242984 on OpenAlexaff
E Orton, R Kelly, James L. Robar

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Cancer CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear particle acceleratorDetectorPhysicsMonte Carlo methodOpticsBeam (structure)PhotonPlanarBerylliumPhoton energyNuclear medicineNuclear physicsMedicineComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: to examine the effect of using low atomic number (Z) target materials on megavoltage portal and cone‐beam CT (CBCT) image quality. Method and materials: for experimental measurements, four low‐Z targets were installed in a linear accelerator carousel (Varian 2100EX) for the generation of experimental spectra for imaging. The targets were composed of beryllium or aluminum with thicknesses set to approximately 60% of the CSDA range of either 4 MeV or 6 MeV electrons. For CBCT acquisition, the beam and detector were fixed, and a rotation stage was controlled by software to acquire multiple angular projections of phantoms. To examine photon energy spectra and to provide a means for optimizing the imaging system, the beam generation and detector panel were modeled using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZ Monte Carlo package. For 6MV, the beam/detector model was validated by comparing experimental and MC‐generated images of open fields. Results: The modeled, experimental spectra demonstrate the recovery of photons below 150 keV. For the 4 MeV/Be beam, for example, approximately 1/3 rd of photons have energies below 60 keV. MC models of planar imaging show significant improvement of image contrast compared to the standard 6MV beam, and suggest that i) of the four energy/target combinations studied, the 4 MeV/Be combination provides the greatest contrast improvement and ii) a modest additional increase in contrast is achieved by removing the copper buildup layer from the detector. Initial low‐Z target CBCT images show improved image contrast; full quantitative results will be presented. Conclusion: The use of megavoltage electron beams combined with low‐Z targets offers the potential for improved image quality, particularly in terms of image contrast. This approach may be promising for improved and highly‐integrated on‐board megavoltage imaging. Conflict of interest: This research has been sponsored by Varian Medical Systems, Incorporated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207