MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978252917 · doi:10.2118/03-02-05

Preliminary Results From a Solvent Gas Injection Field Test in a Depleted Heavy Oil Reservoir

2003· article· en· W1978252917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringHectareVolume (thermodynamics)Oil productionOil fieldAcreOil in placePetroleumHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeographyAgricultural scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A field test was run during 1997 and 1998 to collect preliminary data on a solvent gas injection process. The site selected for the test was a "typical" Frog Lake, Alberta, Cummings formation reservoir that had been depleted using PC pump-based cold production methods on both 4 hectare (10 acre) and 8.1 hectare (20 acre) spacing. At the time of solvent injection, area average recovery from the test location was 9.5%, and the existence of wormholes in the reservoir was strongly suggested by regional well-to-well water migration and production of reservoir sand at high initial rates and cumulative volumes. A solvent containing 33 volume % propane and 67 volume % methane was injected at two converted central producers until cumulative volumes of 2 million m3 and 4 million m3 were achieved. This paper discusses field observations during the injection, soak, and production periods. A number of circumstances contributed to a poor economic result, but the operational and technical information obtained should prove helpful to operators considering application of solvent injection processes. Introduction Cold Production in Western Canadian Regional Heavy Oil Sands PC pump-based cold production has expanded rapidly following initial development in the 1980s. This exploitation methodology provides a large percentage of the produced oil volume for most Western Canadian heavy oil producers. Some producers use only this method. Despite continued efforts to improve PC pump-based cold production technology, current methods generally leave 80 to 95% of the OOIP behind at economic limit. While this is a large oil-inplace target for follow-up EOR processes, the cold production process appears to have strongly altered reservoir conditions. Wormhole channels have been implied and described on the basis of observed high produced sand volumes and rapid migration of edge water and injected fluids and tracers(1–3). The reservoirs are generally pressure depleted. Solution gas, which appears to help power production through mechanisms described as either foamy oil flow(4–6) or more recently as extremely low gas mobility(7), often appears to "blow down" at the end of a well's life. Water influx, likely through wormhole networks, sometimes occurs at wells distant from the original oil/water contact. Thermal Production in Western Canadian Regional Heavy Oil Sands During the 1960s, operators attempted steam processes in selected heavy oil regional sands to recover a higher fraction of OOIP. It was soon determined that the typical H-40 casings with non-thermal cement would not withstand the resulting thermal stresses. Insulated tubing strings with or without packers were tried, but these strings were expensive, fragile, and often did not achieve theoretical performance in the field. Thermal completions in newer wells avoided wellbore failure due to the use of premium tubulars and collars, but other problems occurred. Often the steam had to be injected at pressures exceeding the formation parting (fracture) pressure to achieve acceptable heat transfer rates to the reservoir. This resulted in rapid steam channeling to neighboring wells, or to neighboring formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it