MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978299585 · doi:10.3166/ria.20.529-551

De la construction du corpus émotionnel au système de détection. Le point de vue applicatif de la surveillance dans les lieux publics

2006· article· fr· W1978299585 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chloé Clavel, Ioana Vasilescu, Gaël Richard, Laurence Devillers

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study presented in this paper deals with the modelling of extreme emotions occurring in abnormal situations. The aimed application is civil safety and surveillance in the public places in particular. A corpus of fiction (SAFE Corpus) is selected illustrating rich and varied contexts with the presence of extreme emotions, mainly fear. An annotation strategy adapted to the application is then developed, with both generic and specific descriptors. Finally, a detection system of fear emotions based on acoustic cues is implemented to carry out an evaluation. On the one hand the system is robust to context changes. On the other hand, the influence of multimodal annotation is minor. Results obtained with the various protocols are similar: fear is recognized with 67% of success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207