MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978362497 · doi:10.1002/pen.20325

Boron nitride and fluoropolymer combinations: Interactions and their performance as processing aids

2005· article· en· W1978362497 on OpenAlexaff
Edward B. Muliawan, Nimish Rathod, Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos, Martin Sentmanat

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoropolymerMaterials scienceBoron nitrideCompoundingComposite materialPolymerAdsorptionPolyethyleneExtrusionOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work, we studied the adsorption capacity of boron nitride (BN) for fluoropolymer and polyethylene (PE) to gain a better understanding of the interactions and the performance of BN and fluoropolymer, and their combinations as processing aids in the extrusion of Ziegler‐Natta PEs. We found that BN has a relatively high adsorption capacity for both PE and fluoropolymer. As a result, simultaneous compounding of BN and fluoropolymer into the host polymer causes fluoropolymer to be trapped within the bulk of the polymer, and prevents the fluoropolymer particles from coating the die wall during flow. This limits the effectiveness of fluoropolymer and BN as processing aids. To avoid this interaction, we added fluoropolymer separately in a dry form just prior to extrusion. In this case, the synergistic effect of BN and fluoropolymer as a combination processing aid was evident. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:669–677, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207