MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978384613 · doi:10.1145/1651587.1651595

A session generalization technique for improved web usage mining

2009· article· en· W1978384613 on OpenAlexafffund
Tahira Hasan, Sudhir P. Mudur, Nematollaah Shiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeneralizationComputer scienceSession (web analytics)ScalabilityHierarchySet (abstract data type)Sample (material)Data miningQuality (philosophy)Theoretical computer scienceInformation retrievalMachine learningWorld Wide WebDatabaseMathematicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalization of web sessions is an effective approach used to overcome two major challenges in web usage mining, namely quality and scalability. Given a concept hierarchy, such as a website, generalization replaces actual page-clicks with their general concepts, i.e., nodes at higher levels. Presently known methods do this by choosing a level in the hierarchy, below which all the nodes are generalized to nodes at this level. The problem with this is that significant items may be coalesced, and insignificant ones may be retained. We present a usage driven generalization algorithm, which coalesces less significant pages into more general ones, independent of their level in the hierarchy. Based on actual usage set of sessions, item significance is estimated approximately but fast, using a small stratified sample of the large dataset. While providing scalability, the proposed generalization technique results in improved efficiency and quality of the discovered usage model, demonstrated through numerous experiments in our work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207