MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978423226 · doi:10.3109/00016341003732349

Smoking and pregnancy

2010· editorial· en· W1978423226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zsuzsanna Jakab

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2010
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyMiscarriageEnvironmental healthDisadvantagedQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic growthGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This issue of the journal highlights an important problem for the health of women and children. In most of the WHO European Region, smoking in pregnancy is the leading cause of poor pregnancy outcome and prenatal death. It can cause serious health problems including ectopic pregnancy, increased risk of miscarriage, complications during labor, preterm birth, stillbirth, low birthweight and sudden unexpected death in infancy. Women smokers are also less likely to breastfeed, tend to wean their babies earlier and have lower milk production than non-smokers. Even being exposed to other people's smoke is especially dangerous for pregnant women, who have a 20% greater chance of giving birth to a low birthweight baby than women who are not exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) during pregnancy. While smoking is declining among women in some high income countries it is increasing in low and middle income countries (LMIC). Europe contains some of the world's richest countries, but it also is home to many LMICs. Two decades ago, transnational tobacco companies seized the opportunity of the switch to a market economy to buy state-owned tobacco companies, locally produce and heavily promote ‘western’ brands of cigarettes in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Much effort was concentrated on creating a market for cigarettes among women. Currently about a quarter of women in LMICs in the European Region smoke and prevalence is still rising. Even in wealthier countries, smoking is stubbornly concentrated among the most disadvantaged. In countries like the UK or Sweden, those who smoke through pregnancy are likely to be among the socially disadvantaged - young, single, of low income and educational attainment. In both disadvantaged populations in richer countries and in LMIC, male smoking rates are high exposing women and children to SHS at home and in public places. Within the European Union, lung cancer deaths are nearly three times higher for female compared to male non-smokers. A smoke free pregnancy is vital to both mother and child. Health professionals should offer advice and information to all pregnant smokers at the first prenatal visit and throughout the pregnancy. Help to quit should also be extended to the fathers or other family members living with the pregnant smoker. They should understand the consequences of their own smoking on the pregnant woman, the child and on themselves. However advantageous a smokefree pregnancy is, health professionals and policy makers should not allow attention on the health of the baby to eclipse the health of the woman herself. Many women spontaneously stop smoking in pregnancy only to return to smoking after the birth of their child. The message to women needs to be clear: quitting smoking now is the best present you can give your baby; staying stopped for life is the best present you can give yourself. Unless policy makers act decisively, smoking will rise among European women in the next decade. An increase in smoking prevalence has already been observed in some countries. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey shows an increase in smoking among 13–15 year old girls in between 2003 and 2008. Moreover, there are indications that the health message is not getting through to girls: a greater proportion of girls had favorable attitudes to smoking and more indicated that they were likely to start smoking in the next year compared to the previous survey. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) is our key instrument for effective tobacco control nationally and internationally. The FCTC clearly points out the alarming increase in tobacco use among women and girls, the need for gender-specific tobacco control strategies and the necessity for women to participate at all levels of tobacco policy making. Parties to the Convention are obliged to implement a range of measures, and some of these will be especially important to helping women stay smokefree - tobacco price, smokefree places, pictorial health warnings and promotion and marketing of tobacco. I would urge governments in the WHO European Region and around the world to be proactive in their implementation of the FCTC. They should see their responsibility as not just to satisfy the minimum requirement, but to try to attain the highest standards as part of their comprehensive approach to controlling tobacco use. The world's mothers and children deserve no less than a healthy, smoke free pregnancy and life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207