Fe(CO)<sub>5</sub> Thin Films Adsorbed on Au(111) and on Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers: I. Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adsorption of Fe(CO)(5) onto Au(111)/mica and C(4), C(8), C(12), and C(16) SAMs/Au(111)/mica surfaces has been studied using infrared spectroscopy to elucidate the coverage-dependent structures of these films and the intermolecular couplings that determine the form of the spectra. For all substrates, the first layer is composed of molecules physisorbed with one axial and two equatorial carbonyl groups directed toward the substrate; subsequent layers are preferentially oriented with the C(3) molecular axis aligned perpendicular to the substrate (i.e., one axial carbonyl group directed toward the substrate). The axial vibrational band systematically shifts to higher frequencies with increasing surface coverage because of the effects of intermolecular coupling of the quasiparallel transition dipole moments. The strong effects of dipolar coupling are also witnessed by the trends of the band positions when the distance to the image plane is systematically varied using highly organized self-assembled organic substrates; no band shifts are observed when dilute Fe(CO)(5) is embedded in Xe matrixes under identical experimental conditions. The as-deposited films are structurally stable below 125 K on Au(111)/mica surfaces and below 100 K on the organic self-assembled monolayers. The instability of the films above these temperatures demonstrates that the as-adsorbed films do not form thermodynamically well-defined phases but are structurally metastable. The results presented herein and in the companion paper provide a consistent framework to interpret the spectroscopy of these systems that resolves outstanding issues concerning these films and provides a structural model that explains the dynamic properties of these films during exposure to low-energy electron beams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".