Basal replication of hepatitis C virus in nude mice harboring human tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can infect and propagate in humans and chimpanzees. Whereas the chimpanzee has been used as an animal model for infection, ethical considerations, conservation, and the prohibitively high cost preclude progress for experimental research on the biology of the virus. The development of a small animal model for HCV infection is thus desirable to facilitate studies on the infectious cycle of the virus and for the evaluation of drugs for the treatment of HCV infections in humans. As an alternative to the chimpanzee model, we have established a model based on ex vivo infection of orthotopically-implanted human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HCC) in athymic nude mice. The results show that up to 42 days post-infection, HCV RNA was present in the tumor cells as well as in the liver and serum of infected mice. Furthermore, a direct correlation between size of the tumor and the presence of HCV RNA in the liver was observed, which is concordant with the finding that HCV RNA was detectable only in mice harboring human tumor. Immunohistochemistry analysis of infected liver specimens showed cells expressing the HCV encoded NS5B protein. A few mice developed a humoral response against the nonstructural viral proteins, providing further evidence for expression of these proteins during viral infection. In summary, these results suggest that mice harboring orthotopic tumors support a basal level of HCV replication in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".