Crossover Point between Dialkoxy Disulfides (ROSSOR) and Thionosulfites ((RO)<sub>2</sub>SS): Prediction, Synthesis, and Structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isomeric preference between cyclic dialkoxy disulfides and thionosulfites is governed by the ring size of the heterocycle. Rings smaller than seven atoms prefer the thionosulfite connectivity, whereas larger rings or acyclic analogues favor the unbranched dialkoxy disulfide structure. Density functional calculations were employed to predict the crossover point at which both constitutional isomers are of comparable stability. Follow-up synthesis provides the previously unknown eight-membered ring dialkoxy disulfide 14 and seven-membered ring thionosulfite 15 from the same reaction. X-ray crystallography for all but one of the reaction products and complementary NMR analysis furnishes insights into both solid-state and solution conformations. A long-standing issue regarding the concerted vs catalyzed isomerization pathway between XSSX and X(2)S=S has been addressed for X = RO and shown to be acid dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it