MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978489006 · doi:10.1002/ett.1210

Cohen–Merhav bounds on the symbol error rate of uncoded signalling in AWGN interference

2007· article· en· W1978489006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Transactions on Telecommunications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdditive white Gaussian noiseAlgorithmMathematicsUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceBounding overwatchChannel (broadcasting)Interference (communication)Range (aeronautics)SignallingBernoulli's principleStatisticsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using a recent Bonferroni‐type inequality proposed by Cohen and Merhav, we develop new tight lower bounds on the word error probability of uncoded systems with optimal Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) coherent detection for non‐uniform signalling over additive white Gaussian noise channel. Our results are compared to the state‐of‐the‐art Kuai‐Alajaji‐Takahara (KAT) lower bounds and it is shown that the superiority of one bound to another is dependent on the signal constellation, the amount of non‐uniformity of the Bernoulli source to be communicated and the SNR range of interest. It is noted that bounding techniques for the performance evaluation of communication systems are receiving increasing attention today, thanks to their suitability for a wide variety of schemes ranging from uncoded signalling to space–time‐coded multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) systems. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it