Crianças com câncer e suas famílias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"O objetivo deste estudo é revisar a literatura relativa à criança com câncer e sua família, a fim de iden- tificar temas que têm sido pes- quisados e levantar indicadores de necessidades, subsidiando a siste- matização da assistência de enfer- magem. A coleta de dados siste- mática foi realizada em bancos de dados informatizados, entre 1997 e 2002, utilizando-se as palavras- chave child, cancer, chronic illness/ disease, family e nursing . Realizou- se, também, busca não-sistemática de publicações científicas. Os resultados foram apresentados em três temas: impacto do câncer in- fantil no sistema familiar; processo de adaptação e estratégias de enfren- tamento utilizadas pelos pais diante da doença e o processo de perda e luto diante da morte da criança. A revisão demonstrou que a enfer- magem está construindo um conhe- cimento específico sobre as neces- sidades individuais, culturais e regio- nais das famílias de crianças com câncer, para uma assistência de enfermagem que considere o cuidado de acordo com a singularidade de cada caso."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".