MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978530661 · doi:10.1353/can.2005.0051

The Gothic Line: Canada's Month of Hell in World War II Italy, and: Paras Versus the Reich: Canada's Paratroopers at War, 1942-1945 (review)

2004· article· en· W1978530661 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brian Tennyson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld War IICONQUESTGermanHistoryAncient historyNazi GermanySpanish Civil WarMilitary historyClassicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Gothic Line: Canada's Month of Hell in World War II Italy, and: Paras Versus the Reich: Canada's Paratroopers at War, 1942-1945 Brian Tennyson The Gothic Line: Canada's Month of Hell in World War II Italy. Mark Zuehlke. Vancouver & Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre, 2003. Pp. 552, illus. $45.00 Paras Versus the Reich: Canada's Paratroopers at War, 1942-1945. Bernd Horn and Michel Wyczynski. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 2003. Pp. 350, illus. $29.99 These two books are among the latest contributions to the ever-growing literature on Canadian military history, particularly the history of the two German wars of the twentieth century. Both are worthy additions to the canon and not only add to our understanding of Canada's participation in the European campaign in the Second World War but offer excellent reading as well. They also complement one another in interesting ways as both deal with relatively unfamiliar aspects of that participation - the Italian campaign and the role of the 'Forgotten Battalion' in the conquest of Germany - and both discuss the career of General E.L.M. Burns. Paras Versus the Reich tells the story of the 1st Parachute Battalion, which was formed in July 1942 and played a significant role in the D-Day invasion and the subsequent conquest of Germany. It does more than that, however, because it offers a valuable brief history of the evolution of airborne warfare in the 1930s, showing how the Soviet army led the way in developing the concept of deep penetration, which the Germans refined and brought to a whole new level of sophistication. Not surprisingly, the governments and military leaders of the West showed little interest, even when Germany used paratroopers during its blitzkrieg campaign in the spring of 1940. It took the airborne assault on Crete in May 1941 to awaken them to the new reality that combining highly mobile mechanized land forces with control of the air, including the use of airborne troops, was how war was going to be fought in the middle of the twentieth century. The British and American governments responded with alacrity, creating airborne units of their own, and the Canadian government, which had seen no purpose for paratroopers at all, inevitably hastened to keep up. But while it is true that there had been virtually no interest among Canadian political and military leaders in developing airborne capability - hardly surprising when one remembers that the entire Canadian professional army in 1939 comprised 4,000 men who possessed only rudimentary equipment - there was one notable exception. Colonel E.L.M. Burns, who was once described as 'the brain that marches like a soldier,' had spent the interwar years arguing the case for mechanization and mobility. He was in England in 1939-40 and, unlike most others, [End Page 802] understood what he witnessed. Accordingly, when he returned to Canada in July 1940 to become assistant deputy chief of the general staff, it was only a matter of weeks before he submitted his first proposal to create a parachute battalion. Burns was an intellectual soldier, a rare breed perhaps, but he also lacked 'personality,' with the result that he was unable to persuade either Crerar or anyone else at National Defence Headquarters, let alone in the government. It took the fall of Crete and the leadership of the British and American governments to do that, but Burns had prepared the way. In any event, the 1st Parachute Battalion was created, but because it was attached to the British 6th Airborne Division, its members tended to call it the 'Forgotten Battalion.' Its contribution to the conquest of Germany, which Horn and Wyczynski describe in considerable detail, was significant. It was the first Canadian unit to land in Occupied Europe in the early hours of 6 June 1944, and it was the only Canadian unit to participate in the Battle of the Bulge, going in with the 6th Airborne to help plug the gap caused when the Germans broke through the American line. And when the Allied armies crossed the Rhine in March 1945, it penetrated Germany more deeply than any other Canadian unit, ending the war at Wismar on the shores...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207