MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978537574 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03355-0

Identification of the ice‐binding face of antifreeze protein from <i>Tenebrio molitor</i>

2002· article· en· W1978537574 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher B. Marshall, Margaret E. Daley, Laurie A. Graham, Brian D. Sykes, Peter L. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntifreeze proteinSteric effectsMutagenesisChemistryFolding (DSP implementation)BiochemistryProtein foldingStereochemistryCrystallographyMutationBiophysicsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beetle Tenebrio molitor produces several isoforms of a highly disulfide-bonded beta-helical antifreeze protein with one surface comprised of an array of Thr residues that putatively interacts with ice. In order to use mutagenesis to identify the ice-binding face, we have selected an isoform that folds well and is tolerant of amino acid substitution, and have developed a heating test to monitor refolding. Three different types of steric mutations made to the putative ice-binding face reduced thermal hysteresis activity substantially while a steric mutation on an orthogonal surface had little effect. NMR spectra indicated that all mutations affected protein folding to a similar degree and demonstrated that most of the protein folded well. The large reductions in activity associated with steric mutations in the Thr array strongly suggest that this face of the protein is responsible for ice binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207